AITAH for thinking that my gf losing her parental rights for 3 of 4 of her kids is a red flag?
He entered the relationship hopeful and open-hearted, only to find himself tangled in a web of half-truths and painful uncertainties. The woman he cared for carried a past filled with shadows—children he never knew about and stories that didn’t quite add up—leaving him questioning everything he thought he understood about their bond.
Caught between love and doubt, he wrestled with the weight of her revelations, unsure whether to trust her words or protect his own heart. Each day became a battle between hope and skepticism, as he searched desperately for clarity in a story that seemed too complicated to unravel.
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
As renowned family therapist Dr. Terri Cole explains, 'Healthy boundaries are not about controlling other people; they're about knowing what's okay with you and what's not okay with you.'
The core issue presented here revolves around undisclosed life facts and boundary violations. The girlfriend (32F) withheld information about having four children and the lack of parental rights for three of them until months into the relationship. For the original poster (27M), this omission represents a fundamental breakdown of transparency required for committed partnership. The differing timelines and details provided suggest a pattern of selective disclosure, which naturally erodes trust, regardless of the stated reasons (such as issues with the biological father). In established relationships, partners expect complete honesty regarding major life components, such as children, finances, or significant health history.
The OP's feelings of doubt are a rational response to incomplete data. While the girlfriend may have feared judgment or rejection, leading to the initial secrecy, her actions placed an unfair emotional burden on the OP to process a complex family structure retroactively. The OP's current actions—thinking intensely and seeking advice—are appropriate for assessing the relationship's viability. Moving forward, the OP must clearly communicate that trust requires full disclosure moving forward. A constructive recommendation is to engage in a calm, direct conversation focusing specifically on *why* the information was withheld and what mechanisms will be put in place to ensure complete honesty about all future major disclosures.
AFTER THIS STORY DROPPED, REDDIT WENT INTO MELTDOWN MODE – CHECK OUT WHAT PEOPLE SAID.:
The community had thoughts — lots of them. From tough love to thoughtful advice, the comment section didn’t disappoint.
The original poster is grappling with significant uncertainty and distrust stemming from the revelation that his girlfriend withheld crucial information regarding the number of her children and his lack of parental rights over three of them. His current emotional state is defined by doubt about his girlfriend's honesty and a struggle to reconcile this hidden reality with their established relationship.
Given the substantial nature of the concealed information, the central question becomes: Is a foundational trust in a relationship irreparably damaged by the initial, extensive omission of such significant life facts, or can honesty, even when belated, be sufficient grounds to continue building a future together?