AITAH- Got a family kicked from R rated film because the kid was disturbing
In the quiet anticipation of a shared escape, a brother and sister settle into their seats, ready to lose themselves in the haunting world of Joker: Folie à Deux. What begins as a simple night out quickly twists into a confrontation with discomfort and disillusionment, as the innocence of childhood collides with the raw, unfiltered darkness unfolding on the screen.
Amid the flickering shadows of the cinema, the fragile boundary between entertainment and exposure shatters, leaving a sister shaken and a brother compelled to act. Their story becomes a poignant reminder of the responsibility we bear to protect innocence, even in the most unexpected places.
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
As renowned researcher Dr. Brené Brown explains, “Boundaries are the distance at which I can love you and me simultaneously.” This situation highlights a classic tension between personal comfort, adherence to social rules, and the emotional labor involved in enforcing those rules in public.
The OP's primary motivation was twofold: addressing the clear violation of the theater's rules (recording the screen) and responding to their sister's expressed discomfort regarding the content and the family's reaction to it. Bringing very young children to an R-rated film is often seen as a lapse in parental judgment, but the direct violation (recording) gave the OP a legitimate, objective reason to involve staff. The sister’s discomfort amplified the need for intervention. While leaving the theater afterward might feel like an overreaction or a concession, it was a direct result of the circumstances created by the other family.
The OP's action of reporting the screen recording was appropriate as it involved theft of intellectual property and violation of theater policy, regardless of the children's age. A more constructive path, however, might have involved addressing the *behavior* (recording/laughing inappropriately) first, perhaps via a non-confrontational appeal to the parents, before escalating to staff intervention regarding the recording itself. Nonetheless, given the situation deteriorated to the point of the sister needing a break, the OP acted reasonably to restore a tolerable environment.
THIS STORY SHOOK THE INTERNET – AND REDDITORS DIDN’T HOLD BACK.:
This one sparked a storm. The comments range from brutally honest to surprisingly supportive — and everything in between.
🙄🤬
The original poster (OP) faced a conflict between wanting to support their sister and feeling obligated to intervene when disruptive and inappropriate behavior occurred during an R-rated movie, especially involving young children recording the screen. The OP acted decisively by reporting the recording, which led to the family being removed, a decision that caused momentary discomfort for the OP but resolved the initial disturbance.
Was the OP justified in reporting the behavior, even though it led to the family being ejected and causing the OP to leave the movie early, or should they have tolerated the situation to avoid confrontation? Should adults prioritize maintaining the experience for others or avoid confrontation when minor rule-breaking occurs in public spaces?